|
- 6.1 Types of histopathological specimens
in 2009
- 6.2 Types of cytological specimens in 2009
- 6.3 Number of paraffin blocks in 2009
- 6.4 Number of HP and cytological findings in
2009
and total by institutions
- 6.5 Workload of pathologists in 2009 and
in 1989-2009
- 6.6 Workdays spent for completion of HP
reports in 2009
- 6.7 Evaluation of clinical diagnoses H ,
C , CytoN,
CytoP
- 6.8 Examples of crosstabulation for
- breast crosstabulations
- positive predictive value and sensitivity of FNAB of breast (37090),
Bayes
- cervix
- correlations of gynecological cythology
with histopathology
- 6.9 An example of the monthly comment on the Correlation
between Histopathology and Cytology (February
2004) - Table 1,2,3,4,5
- An example of the monthly comment on the Correlation
between Cytology and Histopathology (February 2004) - Table
6,7,8,9,10,11
- 6.10 POSSIBLE IMPACT OF TREATED DYSPLASIAS AND
CARCINOMA IN SITU FOUND BY AN OPORTUNISTIC CYTOLOGICAL SCREENING ON CERVICAL
INVASIVE CARCINOMA IN MACEDONIA 2004 and
2005.
- 6.11 Differences between definitive arbitrary histopathological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial carcinoma and previous cytological and biopsy
findings. 2005,2006,2007,2008. (N = 624)
- 6.12
REALISED DIAGNOSTIC VALUE
OF VAGINAL CYTODIAGNOSTIC OF PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE CERVICAL CARCINOMA,
AFTER SURGICAL THERAPY AND IRRADIATION. ( 1989 – 2006 ; N = 4.558 )
- 6.13
The number of patients with one to >=10
cytological examination according the time interval between the first and last
cytological finding. N=115.471. 1996-2009
- 6.14
Annual numbers of histopathological and cytological findings according
SNOP localization 1899-2008
- 6.15 The list of topographic sites (SNOP)
not appearing in 1989-2009
- 6.16 The list of diagnoses (SNOP) not appearing
in 1989-2006
- Errors
|